良性阵发性位置性眩晕患者最佳复位时机选择及急性期复位方案探讨
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

北京市海淀医院耳鼻喉科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Exploring the optimal timing and acute reduction plan for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo patients
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 探究良性阵发性位置性眩晕(BPPV)患者最佳复位时机以及急性期复位方案。方法 选择2021年1月至2023年7月于我院就诊的后半规管BPPV患者(184例)为研究对象;根据病程分为A组(n=56,<24 h)、B组(n=68,24 h~7 d)和C组(n=60,>7 d);观察三组间在复位后1 d,1周,1个月内的有效率等参数,根据复位治疗方法,分为Semont组(n=96)和Epley组(n=88)。采用广义估计方程(GEE)评估不同治疗组患者的症状、生活质量的改善情况。结果 不同病程A、B、C组患者复位后1 d、1周后的总有效率均差异显著(P<0.05);其中B组总有效率均最高,分别为92.65%、95.59%。复位1 d、1周后,B组患者的眩晕障碍量表(DHI)评分均显著低于A、C组(P<0.05)。与Semont组相比,Epley组患者复位1 d、1周、1个月后的总有效率均更高(P<0.05)。与Semont组相比,Epley组患者复位1 d、1周后的各症状评分均更低(P<0.05)。与Semon组相比,Epleyt组患者复位1 d、1周后的DHI躯体、功能维度评分均更低(P<0.05)。GEE分析结果显示,Epley组患者复位1 d、1周后的症状、生活质量的改善情况均显著优于Semont组(P<0.05)。结论 不同病程的后半规管BPPV患者临床疗效差异显著,复位最佳时期是发病后24 h~7 d,患者体验感较好,有效率高。后半规管BPPV采取Epley法较Semont法疗效更好,能够显著改善患者的不适症状,并降低疾病对其生活的影响。

    Abstract:

    Objective To explore the optimal timing and acute reduction plan for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) patients. Methods Select patients (184 cases) with BPPV in the posterior semicircular canal who visited our hospital from January 2021 to July 2023 as the research subjects; Divided into Group A (n=56, <24 h), Group B (n=68, 24 h~7 d), and Group C (n=60, >7 d) according to the course of the disease; Observe the effective rates and other parameters among the three groups within 1 d, 1 week, and 1 month after reduction, and according to the reduction treatment method, they were divided into Semont group (n=96) and Epley group (n=88). Generalized estimating equation (GEE) was used to evaluate the improvement of symptoms and quality of life among patients in different treatment groups. Results There were significant differences in the total effective rates of patients in groups A, B, and C with different disease courses after 1 d and 1 week of reduction (P<0.05); Group B had the highest total efficacy, with 92.65% and 95.59% respectively. After 1 day and 1 week of reduction, the dizziness handicap inventory (DHI) scores of patients in Group B were significantly lower than those in Groups A and C (P<0.05). Compared to the Semont group, patients in the Epley group had higher overall effective rates after 1 d, 1 week, and 1 month of reduction (P<0.05). Compared to the Semont group, patients in the Epley group had lower symptom scores after 1 d and 1 week of reduction (P<0.05). Compared with the Semon group, patients in the Epley group had lower DHI physical and functional dimension scores after 1 d and 1 week of reduction (P<0.05). The GEE analysis results showed that the improvement in symptoms and quality of life of patients in the Epley group after 1 d and 1 week of reduction was significantly better than that in the Semont group (P<0.05). Conclusion There is significant difference in clinical efficacy among patients with BPPV in the posterior semicircular canal of different disease stages, and the optimal period for restoration is 24 h~7 d after onset of the disease, with good patient experience and a high effectiveness rate. The Epley method is more effective than the Semont method in treating BPPV in the posterior semicircular canal, which can significantly improve the patient"s discomfort symptoms and reduce the impact of the disease on their daily life.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-19
  • 最后修改日期:2024-03-28
  • 录用日期:2024-04-01
  • 在线发布日期:
温馨提示

本刊唯一投稿网址:www.xyosbs.com
唯一办公邮箱:xyent@126.com
编辑部联系电话:0731-84327210,84327469
本刊从未委托任何单位、个人及其他网站代理征稿及办理其他业务联系,谨防上当受骗!

关闭