秦茂林[1],2 宣丽萍1 刘芳利1王平平1 叶寒雪1 张青2 王节1*
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.芜湖市第二人民医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科/听力与言语医学中心;2.上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科/上海交通大学医学院耳科学研究所/上海市耳鼻疾病转化医学重点实验室

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划(2024YFC2511100);国家自然科学基金资助项目(82171137);上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院科研基金(23XHCRO5A)


Observational Study on the Impact of Middle Ear Effusion on Inner Ear Function in Patients with Otitis Media with Effusion
Author:
Affiliation:

华东师范大学附属芜湖医院(芜湖市第二人民医院)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 本研究旨在探讨中耳积液对分泌性中耳炎(otitis media effusion,OME)内耳功能影响的观察。方法 分析2022年1月至2024年1月就诊于华东师范大学附属芜湖医院的39例单侧OME伴骨导听阈升高患者(病例组)及50例无骨导改变OME患者(对照组)的临床数据,并对比病例组患侧耳、健侧耳、患侧耳治疗后(无鼓室积液)三组听力的变化,以及相关变量对患侧耳治疗前后骨导听力的影响。结果 病例组头晕/眩晕发生率显著高于对照组(P=0.002),且初次干预时间较对照组延迟(P=0.008)。病例组高频骨导听力损伤特征明显,患侧耳2kHz、4kHz骨导阈值(34.1±13.27dB、29.49±15.04dB)显著高于健侧耳(20.26±11dB、19.87±12.59dB,P<0.001),积液解除后,患侧耳2kHz、4kHz骨导阈值与健侧耳之间差异仍存在统计学意义(P=0.003)。多元线性回归显示:黏液型积液对2kHz听力恢复呈负向影响(β=0.39,P=0.009),而早期干预(β=-0.402,P=0.024)及无眩晕症状(β=-0.413,P=0.007)是4kHz听力恢复的保护因素。结论 中耳积液可能对内耳功能造成影响,具体表现在部分患者出现头晕/眩晕症状和高频骨导听力不可逆下降,早期干预及积液性质辨识对预后具有重要临床意义。

    Abstract:

    ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate the impact of middle ear effusion on the inner ear function in patients with otitis media with effusion (OME).MethodsClinical data from 39 patients with unilateral OME accompanied by elevated bone conduction thresholds (case group) and 50 OME patients without bone conduction changes (control group), who were admitted to Wuhu Hospital affiliated to East China Normal University between January 2022 and January 2024, were analyzed. Comparisons were made of hearing changes among the affected ears, healthy-side ears, and post-treatment affected ears (without tympanic effusion) in the case group, as well as the influence of relevant variables on bone conduction hearing before and after treatment in the affected ears.ResultsThe incidence of dizziness/vertigo was significantly higher in the case group than in the control group (P=0.002), and the time to first intervention was significantly delayed in the case group compared to the control group (P=0.008). High-frequency bone conduction hearing impairment was prominent in the case group. The bone conduction thresholds at 2 kHz and 4 kHz in the affected ears (34.1±13.27 dB, 29.49±15.04 dB) were significantly higher than those in the healthy-side ears (20.26±11 dB, 19.87±12.59 dB, P<0.001). After effusion resolution, the differences in bone conduction thresholds at 2 kHz and 4 kHz between the treated affected ears and the healthy-side ears remained statistically significant (P=0.003). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that mucoid effusion had a negative impact on hearing recovery at 2 kHz (β=0.39, P=0.009), while early intervention (β=-0.402, P=0.024) and absence of vertigo symptoms (β=-0.413, P=0.007) were protective factors for hearing recovery at 4 kHz.ConclusionMiddle ear effusion may adversely affect inner ear function, manifesting as dizziness/vertigo symptoms and irreversible high-frequency bone conduction hearing loss in some patients. Early intervention and identification of effusion type are of significant clinical importance for prognosis.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-11-18
  • 最后修改日期:2026-02-10
  • 录用日期:2026-02-11
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
温馨提示

本刊唯一投稿网址:www.xyosbs.com
唯一办公邮箱:xyent@126.com
编辑部联系电话:0731-84327210,84327469
本刊从未委托任何单位、个人及其他网站代理征稿及办理其他业务联系,谨防上当受骗!

关闭