前臂桡侧皮瓣和股前外侧皮瓣在软腭癌术后缺损重建中的临床分析
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

福建医科大学附属第二医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

福建省自然科学基金资助项目,基金号:2025J01144


Clinical analysis of the radial flap of the forearm and the anterolateral thigh flap in defect reconstruction after soft palate cancer surgery
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨前臂桡侧皮瓣(RFF)和股前外侧皮瓣(ALT)在软腭癌术后缺损重建中的临床效果,比较两种皮瓣在修复效果、功能恢复及肿瘤预后方面的差异。方法 回顾性分析2017年11月—2025年6月福建医科大学附属第二医院收治的25例软腭癌患者的临床资料,其中13例采用RFF修复(RFF组),12例采用ALT修复(ALT组)。比较两组皮瓣的术中参数(皮瓣面积、血管蒂长度、制备时间)、术后并发症(皮瓣坏死、咽瘘、出血等)及功能恢复(吞咽、言语、鼻咽反流),并评估肿瘤复发率及生存率。结果 两组皮瓣成活率均较高(P=0.740)。RFF组皮瓣面积显著小于ALT组(P=0.003),且制备时间较长(P=0.042)。RFF组和ALT组术后分别发生3例和2例并发症(P=0.541) 。功能评估显示两组皮瓣术后言语、吞咽及鼻咽反流等功能都取得了良好的效果(均P>0.05),但RFF组在言语功能和吞咽功能方面较ALT组呈更佳趋势,RFF组在鼻咽反流方面较ALT组呈更差趋势。两组术后并发症及生存率无显著差异(均P>0.05),但ALT组复发率及远处转移风险呈更高趋势。结论 RFF与ALT均是软腭癌术后缺损重建的有效选择,但需根据具体需要进行个体化选择。

    Abstract:

    Objective To explore the clinical effects of radial forearm free flap(RFF)and the anterolateral thigh flap (ALT) in defect reconstruction after soft palate cancer surgery, and to compare the differences between the two flaps in terms of repair effect,functional recovery and tumor prognosis. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 25 patients with soft palate cancer admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University from November 2017 to June 2025. Among them,13 cases were repaired with RFF (RFF group), and 12 cases were repaired with ALT (ALT group). The intraoperative parameters (flap area, vascular pedicel length, preparation time), postoperative complications (flap necrosis, pharyngeal fistula, bleeding, etc.) and functional recovery (swallowing, speech, nasopharyngeal reflux) of the two groups of flaps were compared, and the tumor recurrence rate and survival rate were evaluated.Results The survival rates of the flaps in both groups were relatively high(P=0.740).The flap area in the RFF group was significantly smaller than that in the ALT group(P=0.003),and the preparation time was longer(P=0.042).There were 3 and 2 cases of complications after the operation in the RFF group and the ALT group respectively (P=0.541).Functional assessment showed that both groups of flaps achieved good results in functions such as speech, swallowing and nasopharyngeal reflux after surgery (all >0.05),but the RFF group was better than the ALT group in terms of speech function and swallowing function,and the RFF group was worse than the ALT group in terms of asopharyngeal reflux.There was no significant difference in postoperative complications and survival rate between the two groups (all P> 0.05),but the recurrence rate and risk of distant metastasis were higher in the ALT group.Conclusion Both RFF and ALT are effective options for postoperative defect reconstruction of soft palate cancer,but individualized selection should be made based on the defect range,tumor stage and functional requirements.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2026-02-25
  • 最后修改日期:2026-03-28
  • 录用日期:2026-04-03
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
温馨提示

本刊唯一投稿网址:www.xyosbs.com
唯一办公邮箱:xyent@126.com
编辑部联系电话:0731-84327210,84327469
本刊从未委托任何单位、个人及其他网站代理征稿及办理其他业务联系,谨防上当受骗!

关闭